​​ Language models like GPT are designed to generate human-like responses based on the patterns they learn from vast amounts of text data. To help the LLM understand the situation or background, and to generate more focused and relevant responses, it’s important to provide a clear context and intent in your prompt.

Step 1: Setting the Context and Intent for a Prompt in LLM

A clear context refers to the background or situation that the prompt is related to, while a clear intent indicates the specific information or action you expect from the model. These two elements help narrow down the possibilities of what the LLM should generate based on your input, making it more likely to produce an accurate and useful response.

Here’s a good example of a prompt that provides a clear context and intent:

👉 “As a software engineer looking to improve my project management skills, I would like to know the key differences between Scrum and Kanban methodologies.”

This prompt provides a clear context (software engineering, project management skills) and a clear intent (comparing Scrum and Kanban methodologies).

On the other hand, here’s a bad example of a prompt that lacks context and intent:

🚫 “Tell me about Scrum and Kanban.”

This prompt is too broad and lacks a specific context or intent, making it difficult for the LLM to determine what specific aspect of Scrum and Kanban it should focus on. The response could be too general or not directly related to your desired information.

To help guide the LLM’s response in the direction you want, you should always aim to provide a clear context and intent in your prompt.

Examples

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary:

Step 2: Tips for Being Specific in Your LLM Prompt

Being specific in your LLM prompt can help the model generate more focused and accurate responses. Large language models use the input they receive to generate responses, so providing specific details and requirements in your prompt can guide the model’s understanding and response generation.

Here are some tactics you can use to make your query more specific:

Good example:

👉 Please provide an XML example of how to retrieve data from a MySQL database using a SELECT statement, including the necessary connection string and query tags. Use the <connection> tag to enclose the connection string and the <query> tag to enclose the SELECT statement.

This prompt uses XML tags as a delimiter to separate the connection string and the SELECT statement, making it easier for the LLM to understand the different parts of the prompt and generate a more accurate response.

Good example:

👉 Please provide an example of how to use the Python pandas library to calculate the mean and standard deviation of a dataset, only using rows where the Country column is set to ‘USA’. Please ensure that your example includes the necessary condition to filter the rows based on the Country column.

This prompt includes a necessary condition to filter rows based on the Country column to only include data from the USA. By providing this condition, it ensures that the LLM generates a response that only includes data from the USA, making it more relevant and accurate for the prompt.

Good example:

👉 Please provide an example of how to use the Python numpy library to add two arrays element-wise. Use the following two arrays as input and output examples: Input array 1: [1, 2, 3] Input array 2: [4, 5, 6] Output array: [5, 7, 9] Your prompt should use these examples to guide the LLM in generating the necessary code to perform the element-wise addition of two arrays.

This prompt provides a few-shot prompting technique by providing a small number of example inputs and outputs to guide the LLM in generating the code necessary to perform element-wise addition of two arrays. By using this technique, the LLM has specific examples to base its response on, resulting in a more targeted and specific response.

Good examples:

👉 “Generate a list of three fictional movie titles along with their directors and genres. Provide the list in JSON format with the following keys: movie_id, title, director, genre.”

This prompt asks for a structured output in JSON format, making it easier for the LLM to generate a response that can be easily processed by other software systems.

When the LLM is presented with a specific query, it can better predict the appropriate words and phrases to generate a response, thanks to its training on a large corpus of text data. Specificity narrows down the possible responses, making it easier for the model to provide a relevant and accurate answer.

For example, here’s a good prompt that is specific in its request:

👉 “Explain how to implement the Merge Sort algorithm in Python, and describe its time complexity and use cases.”

This prompt asks for an implementation of the Merge Sort algorithm in Python and also asks about its time complexity and use cases. This specificity guides the LLM to provide a more focused response.

On the other hand, here’s a bad prompt that lacks specificity:

🚫 “Tell me about sorting algorithms.”

This prompt is vague, making it difficult for the LLM to determine which aspect of sorting algorithms you want to learn about. The response could be too broad or unfocused, which may not address your needs.

By being specific in your query and using tactics like delimiters, checking conditions, and few-shot prompting, you help the LLM understand your request better and generate a more relevant and accurate response.

Examples

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary:

Step 3: Encouraging Thoughtful Responses from Your LLM

While large language models (LLMs) don’t “think” like humans do, they do process and analyze input to generate responses based on patterns observed during their training. By encouraging the model to “think,” you can guide it to consider the information more carefully before producing an answer.

Though LLMs don’t actually have the ability to think, reason, or understand as humans do, adding such instructions can still have a positive impact on the response. It can help the model focus on providing a more in-depth and thoughtful answer based on the context provided.

For example, here’s a good prompt that encourages the LLM to “think”:

👉 “Please take a moment to consider the implications of using a microservices architecture for a large e-commerce platform before providing the pros and cons.”

This prompt encourages the LLM to provide a well-considered and comprehensive response that covers the pros and cons of using a microservices architecture in the given context.

On the other hand, here’s a bad prompt that lacks such instructions:

👉 “What are the pros and cons of microservices?”

This prompt does not instruct the model to consider the implications or context, which could lead to a less comprehensive or generic response that might not be as useful for your specific needs.

Examples

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary:

Step 4: Making Your LLM Prompt Accessible with Plain Language

Large language models (LLMs) have been trained on diverse text data, which includes content with varying degrees of complexity. Using plain language in your prompt can make it easier for the LLM to understand your request and generate a more accurate response.

Simpler language allows the LLM to focus on the essence of the question rather than trying to decipher complex terms or jargon, leading to more accurate and relevant responses. It also makes the generated response more accessible and easier to understand for a wider audience.

For example, here’s a good prompt that uses plain language to ask about APIs and their function:

👉 Explain how an API works and how it is used to exchange data between different applications.

It’s easy to understand, and the LLM can generate a straightforward response that explains APIs without delving into technical jargon.

On the other hand, here’s a bad prompt that uses complex language and jargon:

🚫 “Elaborate on the intricacies of API-mediated inter-application data transfer mechanisms.”

This prompt can be more difficult for the LLM to understand, resulting in a less clear or unnecessarily complex response.

Examples

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary:

Step 5: Improving LLM Responses with Step-by-Step Explanations

Requesting step-by-step explanations can help ensure the LLM’s response is structured and well-organized. When you request a step-by-step explanation, you guide the LLM to provide information in a structured manner, making it easier to understand and follow.

Large language models (LLMs) generate responses based on the patterns observed in the text data they’ve been trained on. By asking for step-by-step instructions or explanations, you help the LLM generate a response that is more coherent and organized, which in turn makes it more useful and easier to comprehend.

For example, here’s a good prompt that specifically asks for a step-by-step guide:

👉 Please provide a step-by-step guide on how to create a simple web application using Django, starting from setting up the environment to deploying the application.

This prompt encourages the LLM to generate a response that is organized and easy to follow, covering the process of creating a web application using Django.

On the other hand, here’s a bad prompt that does not ask for a step-by-step guide:

🚫 “How do I create a web application using Django?”

This prompt may result in a less organized or less detailed response. The generated answer might not be as easy to follow or may not cover the whole process of creating a web application using Django.

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary:

Step 6: Improving LLM Responses by Avoiding Ambiguous Language

Discouraging ambiguous or open-ended language can help you receive clearer and more direct answers from the LLM. Large language models (LLMs) generate responses based on patterns observed in the text data they’ve been trained on. If your prompt includes ambiguous or open-ended language, the LLM may provide an answer that is less focused, less helpful, or not directly related to your desired information.

To guide the LLM to focus on providing specific, clear, and direct information, it’s important to discourage ambiguous or open-ended language in your prompt.

For example, here’s a good prompt that discourages ambiguous or open-ended language:

👉 Describe the main benefits of using a relational database for a small business inventory management system, without using ambiguous or open-ended language.

This prompt asks for specific information about the benefits of using a relational database in the context of a small business inventory management system, while discouraging the use of ambiguous language.

On the other hand, here’s a bad prompt that uses open-ended language:

👉 Why should I use a relational database for my inventory?

This prompt does not specify the context (e.g., small business) and uses open-ended language, which may result in a less useful response that covers a broad range of benefits or reasons.

Good Example:

Bad Example:

Summary: